Morality involves the knowledge between good and bad and right and wrong. Good and bad refers to the positive and negative effects the actions have on people and what effect it has on us. Morality is purely internal and is based upon what you believe and also the arguments you have as to whether or not something is good or bad Essay on Moral Values – Written in English (Essay 2 – Words) Moral values are the key essence of life and it is these values that come along with us through the journey of life. Moral values are basically the principles that guide our life in the righteous path and do not allow us to do any harm to blogger.comted Reading Time: 9 mins Trending Moral essay topics for persuasive essay Religion should be secondary to humanity to save human lives. We cannot keep a country out of communalism which is having a lot of religions. Religious intolerance by the government for minorities can bring social upheavals. There is a thin line Estimated Reading Time: 4 mins
Essay on Moral Values: 8 Selected Essays on Moral Values
This essay will compare and contrast the moral philosophies of three people: St Augustine, Immanuel Kant, and Aristotle.
Everybody has their own concept of what good is. Most people agree on certain things such as the morality of murder, stealing, etc. How these conceptions vary is a different story than the conceptions themselves. With the second consideration, how the person was raised in some ways can determine morals essay perception and intake of knowledge regarding moral and ethical issues. However, some people are not always so predetermined by means of upbringing as morals essay. This independence is different within all of us, morals essay, as our opinions are different from each other.
I will now describe what three philosophers thought was the truth, purpose, or essence of morality. Augustine lived from to CE. He lived in North Africa in the city of Hippo already you can see how the first consideration mentioned earlier might affect Augustines perception. Before becoming Bishop of Hippo, St. Augustine lived a licentious life, morals essay. This previous phase in his life can be said to have had a large affect on his later philosophies morals essay morality, good, and virtue although for some of his views, he could be held as a hypocrite, morals essay.
According to Augustine, in order to achieve perfection of the soul, one must have virtue in 2 their lives. Another way Augustine incorporated love into his philosophy was the love of God morals essay loving oneself and ones neighbour, morals essay. Basically, loving God yourself and your neighbour, helps you to become more virtuous, and as well helps your mind and body; psychologically helping yourself by putting faith in God.
Following this, I come to Aristotle. Aristotle lived from to BCE, and lived for a portion of morals essay life in Athens.
The core of Aristotles account of moral virtue is his doctrine of the mean, morals essay. According to this doctrine, moral virtues are desire-regulating character traits which are at a mean between more extreme character traits. Also, he believes that morality requires a standard which will not only regulate the inadequacies of absolute justice but be also an idea of moral 3 progress.
Since absolute justice is abstract in nature, in the real world, it must be supplemented with equity, which corrects and modifies laws of justice where it falls short. Like Augustine, Morals essay believes that the truly good person is at the same time a person of perfect insight, and a person of perfect insight is also perfectly good. Insight, according to Augustine would be understanding or knowledge of God.
Aristotle goes further to say that our idea of the ultimate and moral action is developed through habitual experience, and this gradually frames itself out of particular perceptions — which can be compared to my three considerations said earlier habitual experience — the area you live, and particular perceptions — degree of objectivity. When it comes to the purpose or will of morality, Aristotle mentions two factors: reason stimulated to act by desire, or desire guided and controlled by understanding.
These two factors according to Aristotle, then motivate the willful moral action. Moral weakness of the will then results in someone doing wrong, morals essay, knowing it is right, and yet follows his desire against his reason. So basically ones reason is what motivates a willful action, and ones desire motivates an action of moral weakness, morals essay. Also like Augustine, Aristotle believes that pleasure is found in the consciousness of free spontaneous action; God cannot be conceived as practising the ordinary moral virtues and must therefore find his happiness in contemplation.
Therefore God is pure good, while man can strive to be that good, he cannot avoid his consciousness of free spontaneous action. Kant lived from to He lived in Konigsberg, East Prussia now Russia.
There are two tests for Kant to determine the morals essay of actions: 1 create a general morals essay and consider whether it could be universal law for all rational beings, and 2 determine whether rational beings would will it to morals essay universal law, morals essay. Basically Kant believed that reason dictated to itself the moral law. Kants views on morality are somewhat different than Aristotle and Augustine, mainly because Kant considered himself to be a revolutionary morals essay. He believed that he brought into philosophy a new method, which he called criticism.
Because of this, there is no wavering in individual cases to determine whether an action is moral or not. An action is moral in itself not because of its consequences but because any rational being wills it to be a universal law and it does not contradict itself.
Utilitarianism according to Kant, states that an action is moral if it increases the total happiness of society. This could be compared to Aristotle, who believes that morality requires a standard which will regulate the morals essay of absolute justice, but definitely not Augustine who strictly believes in Gods law, not peoples law. For Kant, morals essay, however, morality is based on consequences. Kant rejects utilitarianism because it produces immediate gratification and allows man exceptions to common sense moral codes; the answers it gives are unfulfilling and unrealistic.
I am willing to accept that sometimes the moral action is harder to perform, but I am unwilling to accept that morality rests within the specifics of a situation and the possible consequences. I'm Edwin! Would you like to get a custom morals essay How about receiving a customized one? Skip to content This essay will compare and contrast the moral philosophies of three people: St Augustine, Immanuel Kant, and Aristotle.
Previous Previous post: Computer Crime Essay. Next Next post: Fool For Love Essay. Check it out.
Nietzsche: The Genealogy of Morality (Essay 2 - Guilt, Bad Conscience...)
, time: 11:58Morality Essay - Free Argumentative Essays For Students
In the article Moral Luck, Thomas Nagel is defending his definition of moral luck and opposing Kant’s view of moral luck. Kant believes that moral luck is the good will and to do our duty by the reasons for our actions. Nagel believes that this theory is too simple Morality involves the knowledge between good and bad and right and wrong. Good and bad refers to the positive and negative effects the actions have on people and what effect it has on us. Morality is purely internal and is based upon what you believe and also the arguments you have as to whether or not something is good or bad Essay on Morality: Research of Moral Pluralism Based on 3 Principles Samples The greatest gift of human rationality is morality. The establishment of “morality” is based on the recognition that every human has a general set of basic needs to lead a life free of physical and psychological suffering
No comments:
Post a Comment